The Hand Prints of Dr. Albert Einstein-Juniper publishers

 

Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation

Opinion

The name Albert Einstein is synonymous with taking a step in another direction. When viewing the hand prints of Dr. Einstein, we should look at them from a different perspective. In this view, I shall focus on the element of chance rather than replication in recording of the dermal ridge arrangements.

It is understood that when taking impressions, it is not possible to achieve two or more identical copies of the dermal ridge configurations. This is due to the constraining force used to reproduce the ridge formations. Notwithstanding, all impressions taken from the hand will display differences in contour and contrast with regard to the ridges and furrows.

We do not know for certain the number of times impressions had been taken from the hands of Dr. Einstein. If there are additional documents available, we could examine one specimen next to the other. Nor can we say that every record taken would display the same chance phenomenon of abstract appearance. What we do have is this copy and something can be said about the record in hand. The impressions of Dr. Einstein encompass images when viewed in the abstract perspective. I have noted subtle images that appear on the digits and palms. A look from a different position provides the topographic like view of a landform.

A particular abstract observation of the impressions is perceptional and not limited to one individual. View the handprints of Dr. Einstein and see them from another dimension [1] (Figure 1, 2 and Table 1).

Dr. Einstein’s Primary Classification was 8 over 16 (Figure 3). This code has been calculated with the following numerical values assigned to the digits:

1=2, 2=4, 3=8, 4=1, 5=16, 6=1, 7=4, 8=8, 9=2 and 10=16

The geometric design which represents Dr. Einstein’s Primary Classification on a multi-sequential Primary Classification Chart; it includes 8 over 16, 25 over 25 and 25 over 1 (Figure 4).

Each digit which displays a whorl pattern receives the numerical value assigned. The total value of the right hand digits (displaying whorls) plus 1 is the numerator. The total value of the left hand digits (displaying whorls) plus 1 is the denominator. Therefore, the appearance of a whorl pattern on the following digits; 1,2,4,6,7,8 and 9 provides the primary classification of 8 over 16 [2,3] (Figure 5).



To Know more about: Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation

 Click here: https://juniperpublishers.com/jfsci/index.php

To Know more about our Juniper Publishers

 Click here: https://juniperpublishers.com/index.php

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Research Article Intrauterine Insemination with Fresh Versus Cryopreserved Spermatazoa in Unexplained Infertility

Image
Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine    Juniper Publishers Authored by: Sheena Rippentrop* Introduction Infertility affects approximately 14% of couples in the general population and is defined as failure to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse. Unexplained infertility accounts for up to 15-30% of the diagnoses in couples [1,2]. The diagnosis of unexplained infertility is one of exclusion and can only be made after investigating the common causes of infertility using standard testing including evaluation for male and female infertility [1]. This evaluation typically involves assessment of ovulation, ovarian reserve, fallopian tube patency, uterine and cervical factors, along with semen analysis. In couples with infertility, previous studies have shown that ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination (IUI) provides a less invasive and more cost-effective treatment option when compared to in-vitro fertilization in couples with ...
Read more

Ruptured Rudimentary Horn Pregnancy in a Multiparous Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine    Juniper Publishers Authored by:  Sarwat Khan* Case Report We present a case report of 31 yrs old Gravida 4 para 2+1 patient with two previous term vaginal deliveries. She presented with a rupture of undiagnosed rudimentary horn of uterus at 18 weeks. Laparotomy was performed and rudimentary horn was excised with good recovery postoperatively. The need for high index of suspicion and early diagnosis using ultrasonography is emphasised. Conclusion: Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn carries grave risk to the mother. There is need for increase awareness of this rare condition and to have a high index of suspicion at time of booking. Go to Introduction Mullerian duct anomalies occur during embryonic development due to defective fusion, canalization or absorption of the median septum of the Mullerian ducts in the female reproductive system [ 1 ]. The prevalence of mullerian duct anomalies in the general female popu...
Read more

Sperm-Oviduct Interaction Factors that Compromise Fertility of Frozen Stallion Semen

Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine   Juniper Publishers Abstract The cryopreservation procedure changes the integrity and functionality of sperm, affecting their longevity and the ability to fertilize the oocyte. Moreover, some of those changes could be alter the physiologic interactions between the sperm and the oviductal epithelial cells prior to fertilization, placing further limitations and challenges on frozen-thawed stallion sperm. For fertilization to occur, a sperm subpopulation should be survive in uterine environment and be transported to oviduct, the tubular epithelium that regulate the sperm capacitation process in tuning with the ovulation and later oocyte fecundation. Factors affecting sperm-oviduct interactions in equine and findings in other mammals suggest that this interaction is highly conserved. However, there are differences between species and this interaction may assist to explain the idiopathic infertility associated with t...
Read more